The website uses cookies. These are text data saved by the browser on the user's device. They are used for the proper functioning of the website, collecting statistical information about visitors and operating facilities for logged in users. By using the website, you consent to the use of cookies. The cookie settings can be changed in your browser. If you do not change these settings, you accept the cookies used on the website.

Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements and Objective Measurements after Cubital Tunnel Decompression

Collection
Article
Download bibliographic description
  • Tytuł: Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements and Objective Measurements after Cubital Tunnel Decompression
  • Autor/Autorzy:
  • Nazwa czasopisma: PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
  • Rok: 2018
  • ISSN: 0032-1052
  • DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004291
  • Adres www:: https://journals.lww.com/plasreconsurg/Abstract/2018/05000/Comparison_of_Patient_Reported_Outcome.24
  • Strony od-do:
    • 1171-1181
    • 0.5
  • Język: angielski
  • Abstrakt: Background: The aims of this study were (1) to compare the responsiveness of disease and hand-related issues, including health status–related questions, in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome; and (2) to assess whether these tools and objective hand tests are associated with the results of nerve conduction studies after a simple cubital tunnel syndrome decompression. Methods: Forty-seven patients with diagnosed condition were enrolled in the study. The following tools were used preoperatively and again at 3 and 6 months: the Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation; the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire; the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey; the pain visual analogue scale with activity; the grip and key pinch test, two-point discrimination, and the ulnar nerve conduction studies test. Results: All questionnaires and pain visual analogue scale, two-point discrimination, and nerve conduction studies improved significantly at the 6-month follow-up (p < 0.05) compared with preoperative outcomes. Correlations were observed between preoperative motor conduction velocity, preoperative work of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (R = −0.38; p = 0.049), and pain visual analogue scale during activity (R = 0.47; p = 0.025). A correlation was found between motor conduction velocity change after 6 months and the hand function of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire after 6 months (R = 0.57; p = 0.017). Conclusion: The Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire were more responsive for short-term recovery compared with other measures; however, only the latter correlated with motor conduction velocity.
  • Dyscyplina: nauki medyczne
  • 002 a Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements and Objective Measurements after Cubital Tunnel Decompression
  • 003 a Anna Chrapusta (Autor)
  • 003 a Katarzyna Piątek-Koziej (Autor)
  • 003 a Krzysztof Tomaszewski (Autor)
  • 003 a Marcin Bednarek (Autor)
  • 003 a Marek Szuścik (Autor)
  • 003 a Marek Trybus (Autor)
  • 003 a Marta Banach (Autor)
  • 003 a Mateusz Koziej (Autor)
  • 004 a Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
  • 006 a PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
  • 008 a 2018
  • 011 a 0032-1052
  • 013 a 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004291
  • 014 a https://journals.lww.com/plasreconsurg/Abstract/2018/05000/Comparison_of_Patient_Reported_Outcome.24
  • 015 a 1171-1181
  • 016 a 0.5
  • 017 a angielski
  • 020 a Background: The aims of this study were (1) to compare the responsiveness of disease and hand-related issues, including health status–related questions, in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome; and (2) to assess whether these tools and objective hand tests are associated with the results of nerve conduction studies after a simple cubital tunnel syndrome decompression. Methods: Forty-seven patients with diagnosed condition were enrolled in the study. The following tools were used preoperatively and again at 3 and 6 months: the Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation; the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire; the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey; the pain visual analogue scale with activity; the grip and key pinch test, two-point discrimination, and the ulnar nerve conduction studies test. Results: All questionnaires and pain visual analogue scale, two-point discrimination, and nerve conduction studies improved significantly at the 6-month follow-up (p < 0.05) compared with preoperative outcomes. Correlations were observed between preoperative motor conduction velocity, preoperative work of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (R = −0.38; p = 0.049), and pain visual analogue scale during activity (R = 0.47; p = 0.025). A correlation was found between motor conduction velocity change after 6 months and the hand function of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire after 6 months (R = 0.57; p = 0.017). Conclusion: The Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire were more responsive for short-term recovery compared with other measures; however, only the latter correlated with motor conduction velocity.
  • 966 a nauki medyczne
Repozytorium Akademii Ignatianum w Krakowie, które jest częścią Portalu Pracowniczego zostało zrealizowane w ramach projektu „Program wzmocnienia potencjału dydaktycznego Uczelni na rzecz rozwoju regionalnego” POWR.03.05.00-00-ZR10/18 współfinansowanego ze środków Unii Europejskiej w ramach Europejskiego Funduszu Społecznego.