The Miaphysite and Neo-Chalcedonian Approaches to Understanding the Nature of the Individual Entity: Particular Essence vs. En-Hypostasized Essence

MARC

• 002 $a The Miaphysite and Neo-Chalcedonian Approaches to Understanding the Nature of the Individual Entity: Particular Essence vs. En-Hypostasized Essence
• 003 $b 0000-0002-1556-5448
• 003 $a ANNA ZHYRKOVA (Autor)
• 004 $a Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
• 006 $a Review of Ecumenical Studies - Sibiu
• 008 $a 2019
• 011 $a 2359-8093
• 013 $a 10.2478/ress-2019-0026
• 014 $a https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/ress/11/3/article-p342.xml
• 015 $a 342-362
• 016 $a 1.6
• 017 $a angielski
• 020 $a In debates over the Christological doctrine proclaimed at the Council of Chalcedon, two different Christological stances took shape that in fact carried not only significant theological consequences, but also profound philosophical ones. In the present paper, I shall reflect upon the philosophical premises and arguments employed by both the defenders of Chalcedon and their adversaries. As I shall seek to show, both sides differed, among other things, in regard to their understanding of the individual entity as such. The Miaphysite adversaries of the Chalcedonian Horos adopted what was, from a philosophical point of view, a quite traditional elucidation of individual entities in terms of particular essence. On the other hand, the Neo-Chalcedonian defenders of the Horos developed an original interpretation of the individual entityas explicable in terms of its existence.
• 966 $a filozofia
• 985 $a Wydział Filozoficzny
• 985 $b Instytut Filozofii

Dublin Core

Indexes

• Title: The Miaphysite and Neo-Chalcedonian Approaches to Understanding the Nature of the Individual Entity: Particular Essence vs. En-Hypostasized Essence
• Author: ANNA ZHYRKOVA (Autor)
• Journal: Review of Ecumenical Studies - Sibiu
• Date: 2019
• Discipline: filozofia
• Structure:
  • Instytut Filozofii
  • Wydział Filozoficzny
• Language: angielski

Files