When Meaning Becomes Controversial. Critical Questions for Assessing Semantic Arguments
Description
- Tytuł: When Meaning Becomes Controversial. Critical Questions for Assessing Semantic Arguments
- Autor/Autorzy:
- Nazwa czasopisma: Informal Logic
- Rok: 2024
- Tom: 44
- Numer: 2
- ISSN: 0824-2577
- e-ISSN: 0824-2577
- DOI: 10.22329/il.v44i2.8435
- Adres www:: https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/8435
- Strony od-do: 208–48
- Język: angielski
- Abstrakt: This paper aims to develop the criteria for assessing semantic arguments. However, while this notion constituted the core of ancient dialectics and is addressed in several approaches to argument analysis, the criteria for evaluating such arguments are insufficient. This paper intends to address this problem by combining the insights of classical and contemporary logic and testing them against some controversies involving controversial definitions or classifications. Through detailed case studies of the argumentative uses involving the (re)definitions of racism, war, peace, and feminism, we formulated and tested eight evaluation criteria that may be expressed as critical questions.
- Słowa kluczowe:
- argument semantyczny
- argument z definicji
- definicja perswazyjna
- definicje
- klasyfikacja
- klasyfikacja w
- pytania krytyczne
- schemat argumentacyjny
- Dyscyplina: filozofia
MARC
- 002 $a When Meaning Becomes Controversial. Critical Questions for Assessing Semantic Arguments
- 003 $b 0000-0003-0585-3865
- 003 $a Fabrizio Macagno (Autor)
- 003 $b https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0712-421X
- 003 $a JAKUB PRUŚ (Autor)
- 004 $a Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
- 006 $a Informal Logic
- 008 $a 2024
- 009 $a 44
- 010 $a 2
- 011 $a 0824-2577
- 012 $a 0824-2577
- 013 $a 10.22329/il.v44i2.8435
- 014 $a https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/8435
- 015 $a 208–48
- 017 $a angielski
- 020 $a This paper aims to develop the criteria for assessing semantic arguments. However, while this notion constituted the core of ancient dialectics and is addressed in several approaches to argument analysis, the criteria for evaluating such arguments are insufficient. This paper intends to address this problem by combining the insights of classical and contemporary logic and testing them against some controversies involving controversial definitions or classifications. Through detailed case studies of the argumentative uses involving the (re)definitions of racism, war, peace, and feminism, we formulated and tested eight evaluation criteria that may be expressed as critical questions.
- 021 $a argument semantyczny
- 021 $a argument z definicji
- 021 $a definicja perswazyjna
- 021 $a definicje
- 021 $a klasyfikacja
- 021 $a klasyfikacja w
- 021 $a pytania krytyczne
- 021 $a schemat argumentacyjny
- 022 $a argumentation schemes
- 022 $a classification
- 022 $a correctness of a definition
- 022 $a critical questions
- 022 $a definition
- 022 $a persuasive definition
- 022 $a semantic argument
- 966 $a filozofia
- 985 $a Wydział Filozoficzny
- 985 $b Instytut Filozofii
Dublin Core
Indexes
- Title: When Meaning Becomes Controversial. Critical Questions for Assessing Semantic Arguments
- Author:
- Journal: Informal Logic
- Date: 2024
- Discipline: filozofia
- Słowa kluczowe w j. angielskim:
- Keywords in Polish:
- Structure:
- Language: angielski
Files
2024_art_Pruś_J_Macagno_F_When Meaning Becomes Controversial.pdf (571 KB)
- Licence: Licencja Repozytorium
- Text version: Final published
- Availability: Published