Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements and Objective Measurements after Cubital Tunnel Decompression

Kolekcja
artykuły
Pobierz opis bibliograficzny

Opis

  • Tytuł: Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements and Objective Measurements after Cubital Tunnel Decompression
  • Autor/Autorzy:
  • Nazwa czasopisma: PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
  • Rok: 2018
  • ISSN: 0032-1052
  • DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004291
  • Adres www:: https://journals.lww.com/plasreconsurg/Abstract/2018/05000/Comparison_of_Patient_Reported_Outcome.24
  • Strony od-do:
    • 1171-1181
    • 0.5
  • Język: angielski
  • Abstrakt: Background: The aims of this study were (1) to compare the responsiveness of disease and hand-related issues, including health status–related questions, in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome; and (2) to assess whether these tools and objective hand tests are associated with the results of nerve conduction studies after a simple cubital tunnel syndrome decompression. Methods: Forty-seven patients with diagnosed condition were enrolled in the study. The following tools were used preoperatively and again at 3 and 6 months: the Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation; the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire; the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey; the pain visual analogue scale with activity; the grip and key pinch test, two-point discrimination, and the ulnar nerve conduction studies test. Results: All questionnaires and pain visual analogue scale, two-point discrimination, and nerve conduction studies improved significantly at the 6-month follow-up (p < 0.05) compared with preoperative outcomes. Correlations were observed between preoperative motor conduction velocity, preoperative work of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (R = −0.38; p = 0.049), and pain visual analogue scale during activity (R = 0.47; p = 0.025). A correlation was found between motor conduction velocity change after 6 months and the hand function of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire after 6 months (R = 0.57; p = 0.017). Conclusion: The Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire were more responsive for short-term recovery compared with other measures; however, only the latter correlated with motor conduction velocity.
  • Dyscyplina: nauki medyczne

MARC

  • 002 $a Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements and Objective Measurements after Cubital Tunnel Decompression
  • 003 $a Mateusz Koziej (Autor)
  • 003 $a Marek Trybus (Autor)
  • 003 $a Marta Banach (Autor)
  • 003 $a Marcin Bednarek (Autor)
  • 003 $a Anna Chrapusta (Autor)
  • 003 $a Marek Szuścik (Autor)
  • 003 $a Katarzyna Piątek-Koziej (Autor)
  • 003 $a Krzysztof Tomaszewski (Autor)
  • 004 $a Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
  • 006 $a PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
  • 008 $a 2018
  • 011 $a 0032-1052
  • 013 $a 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004291
  • 014 $a https://journals.lww.com/plasreconsurg/Abstract/2018/05000/Comparison_of_Patient_Reported_Outcome.24
  • 015 $a 1171-1181
  • 016 $a 0.5
  • 017 $a angielski
  • 020 $a Background: The aims of this study were (1) to compare the responsiveness of disease and hand-related issues, including health status–related questions, in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome; and (2) to assess whether these tools and objective hand tests are associated with the results of nerve conduction studies after a simple cubital tunnel syndrome decompression. Methods: Forty-seven patients with diagnosed condition were enrolled in the study. The following tools were used preoperatively and again at 3 and 6 months: the Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation; the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire; the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey; the pain visual analogue scale with activity; the grip and key pinch test, two-point discrimination, and the ulnar nerve conduction studies test. Results: All questionnaires and pain visual analogue scale, two-point discrimination, and nerve conduction studies improved significantly at the 6-month follow-up (p < 0.05) compared with preoperative outcomes. Correlations were observed between preoperative motor conduction velocity, preoperative work of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (R = −0.38; p = 0.049), and pain visual analogue scale during activity (R = 0.47; p = 0.025). A correlation was found between motor conduction velocity change after 6 months and the hand function of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire after 6 months (R = 0.57; p = 0.017). Conclusion: The Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire were more responsive for short-term recovery compared with other measures; however, only the latter correlated with motor conduction velocity.
  • 966 $a nauki medyczne

Dublin Core