The gap effect reduces both manual and saccadic inhibition of return (IOR)
Opis
- Tytuł: The gap effect reduces both manual and saccadic inhibition of return (IOR)
- Autor/Autorzy:
- Nazwa czasopisma: EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
- Rok: 2019
- ISSN: 0014-4819
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05537-8
- Adres www:: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00221-019-05537-8?wt_mc=Internal.Event.1.SEM.ArticleAutho
- Strony od-do:
- 1643-1653
- 1.3
- Język: angielski
- Abstrakt: Inhibition of return (IOR) is the effect of slower responses to validly than invalidly cued targets. The discovery of IOR raised controversy as to whether it has two “flavors”, i.e., attentional/perceptual and motoric, or whether it is a homogeneous visual-motor phenomenon that should be understood in terms of the preparation of different effectors (mainly eye movement). Since manipulation of fixation offset (0 and 200 ms gap) is believed to affect the latency of saccades, we measured its influence on saccadic and manual IOR with a simple keypress response when eye movements were forbidden. In the two experiments which we carried out, the fixation offset decreased IOR in both the saccadic and the manual conditions. The results suggest the limitations of the attentional hypothesis, which assumes that manual IOR is independent of the motoric component; they are also in line with the tenets of the oculomotor hypothesis of IOR.
- Dyscyplina:
- psychologia
- psychologia
MARC
- 002 $a The gap effect reduces both manual and saccadic inhibition of return (IOR)
- 003 $b 0000-0001-9771-4162
- 003 $b 0000-0002-3174-0832
- 003 $a JACEK BIELAS (Autor)
- 003 $a ŁUKASZ MICHALCZYK (Autor)
- 004 $a Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
- 006 $a EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
- 008 $a 2019
- 011 $a 0014-4819
- 013 $a 10.1007/s00221-019-05537-8
- 014 $a https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00221-019-05537-8?wt_mc=Internal.Event.1.SEM.ArticleAutho
- 015 $a 1643-1653
- 016 $a 1.3
- 017 $a angielski
- 020 $a Inhibition of return (IOR) is the effect of slower responses to validly than invalidly cued targets. The discovery of IOR raised controversy as to whether it has two “flavors”, i.e., attentional/perceptual and motoric, or whether it is a homogeneous visual-motor phenomenon that should be understood in terms of the preparation of different effectors (mainly eye movement). Since manipulation of fixation offset (0 and 200 ms gap) is believed to affect the latency of saccades, we measured its influence on saccadic and manual IOR with a simple keypress response when eye movements were forbidden. In the two experiments which we carried out, the fixation offset decreased IOR in both the saccadic and the manual conditions. The results suggest the limitations of the attentional hypothesis, which assumes that manual IOR is independent of the motoric component; they are also in line with the tenets of the oculomotor hypothesis of IOR.
- 966 $a psychologia
- 966 $a psychologia
- 985 $a Wydział Filozoficzny
- 985 $b Instytut Psychologii
Dublin Core
Indeksy
- Tytuł: The gap effect reduces both manual and saccadic inhibition of return (IOR)
- Autor (Twórca):
- Tytuł czasopisma : EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
- Data: 2019
- Dyscyplina: psychologia
- Struktura:
- Język: angielski
Pliki
Michalczyk Ł, Bielas_The gap effect.....pdf (813 KB)
- Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- Wersja tekstu: Ostateczna opublikowana
- Dostępność: Publiczny