Back to the Future: Leo Strauss, Gershom Scholem and the Restorative Messianic Utopia
Opis
- Tytuł: Back to the Future: Leo Strauss, Gershom Scholem and the Restorative Messianic Utopia
- Autor/Autorzy: Piotr Sawczyński (Autor)
- Nazwa czasopisma: Religions
- Rok: 2022
- Tom: 13
- Numer: 618
- ISSN: 2077-1444
- e-ISSN: 2077-1444
- DOI: 10.3390/rel13070618
- Adres www:: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/7/618
- Strony od-do: 1-10
- Język: angielski
- Abstrakt: This article offers a critical analysis of the dispute between two prominent twentieth-century Jewish thinkers—Leo Strauss and Gershom Scholem—on the temporal nature of Jewish messianism, particularly the messianism of the Lurianic kabbalah. Whereas Strauss uses Scholem’s authority to criticize the idea of progress and claims that the messianic idea of Lurianism as interpreted by Scholem is purely restorative, Scholem actually argues for its dialectical nature: neither progressive nor regressive but seeking to synthesize the past and future in the utopian figure of “restoring” the original potentiality. The purpose of my analysis is twofold: to expose Strauss’s misreading of Scholem’s theory which has so far escaped the critical attention of scholars, and to contribute to the debate on religion and change by deconstructing the apparent opposition of progress and return (or utopia and restoration) in Jewish messianic tradition.
- Dyscyplina: nauki o polityce i administracji
MARC
- 002 $a Back to the Future: Leo Strauss, Gershom Scholem and the Restorative Messianic Utopia
- 003 $a Piotr Sawczyński (Autor)
- 004 $a Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
- 006 $a Religions
- 008 $a 2022
- 009 $a 13
- 010 $a 618
- 011 $a 2077-1444
- 012 $a 2077-1444
- 013 $a 10.3390/rel13070618
- 014 $a https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/7/618
- 015 $a 1-10
- 017 $a angielski
- 020 $a This article offers a critical analysis of the dispute between two prominent twentieth-century Jewish thinkers—Leo Strauss and Gershom Scholem—on the temporal nature of Jewish messianism, particularly the messianism of the Lurianic kabbalah. Whereas Strauss uses Scholem’s authority to criticize the idea of progress and claims that the messianic idea of Lurianism as interpreted by Scholem is purely restorative, Scholem actually argues for its dialectical nature: neither progressive nor regressive but seeking to synthesize the past and future in the utopian figure of “restoring” the original potentiality. The purpose of my analysis is twofold: to expose Strauss’s misreading of Scholem’s theory which has so far escaped the critical attention of scholars, and to contribute to the debate on religion and change by deconstructing the apparent opposition of progress and return (or utopia and restoration) in Jewish messianic tradition.
- 022 $a Gershom Scholem
- 022 $a Judaism
- 022 $a kabbalah
- 022 $a Leo Strauss
- 022 $a messianism
- 022 $a progress
- 022 $a return
- 966 $a nauki o polityce i administracji
- 985 $a Wydział Pedagogiczny
- 985 $b Instytut Nauk o Polityce i Administracji
Dublin Core
Indeksy
- Tytuł: Back to the Future: Leo Strauss, Gershom Scholem and the Restorative Messianic Utopia
- Autor (Twórca): Piotr Sawczyński (Autor)
- Tytuł czasopisma : Religions
- Data: 2022
- Dyscyplina: nauki o polityce i administracji
- Struktura:
- Język: angielski