Fixation offset decreases manual inhibition of return (IOR) in detection and discrimination tasks.

Kolekcja
artykuły
Pobierz opis bibliograficzny

Opis

  • Tytuł: Fixation offset decreases manual inhibition of return (IOR) in detection and discrimination tasks.
  • Autor/Autorzy: ŁUKASZ MICHALCZYK (Autor)
  • Nazwa czasopisma: QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
  • Rok: 2024
  • ISSN: 1747-0218
  • e-ISSN: 1747-0226
  • DOI: 10.1177/17470218241240978
  • Adres www:: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17470218241240978
  • Strony od-do: 1-33
  • Język: angielski
  • Abstrakt: Attention can be covertly shifted to peripheral stimuli in order to improve their processing. However, attention is also then inhibited against returning to the previously attended location; thus, both detection and discrimination of a stimulus presented at that location decrease (the inhibition of return effect; IOR). The after-effect of the covert orienting hypothesis (ACOH) postulates a close link between attention shifting, IOR, and oculomotor control. The fixation offset, which improves the generation of saccades, decreases IOR in detection tasks, suggesting a close link between IOR and oculomotor control. However, according to some alternative views (e.g., the input-based IOR hypothesis and the object files segregation/integration hypothesis), IOR may be related to some sensory rather than motor processes. Some studies support that view and show that IOR may occur differently in detection and discrimination tasks and that oculomotor processes do not affect IOR in tasks where manual responses are required and eye movements are suppressed. Two experiments presented in this article show that removing the fixation point decreases manual IOR in detection and discrimination tasks. The results are discussed in terms of various theoretical approaches.
  • Dyscyplina: psychologia

MARC

  • 002 $a Fixation offset decreases manual inhibition of return (IOR) in detection and discrimination tasks.
  • 003 $b 0000-0002-3174-0832
  • 003 $a ŁUKASZ MICHALCZYK (Autor)
  • 004 $a Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
  • 006 $a QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
  • 008 $a 2024
  • 011 $a 1747-0218
  • 012 $a 1747-0226
  • 013 $a 10.1177/17470218241240978
  • 014 $a https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17470218241240978
  • 015 $a 1-33
  • 017 $a angielski
  • 020 $a Attention can be covertly shifted to peripheral stimuli in order to improve their processing. However, attention is also then inhibited against returning to the previously attended location; thus, both detection and discrimination of a stimulus presented at that location decrease (the inhibition of return effect; IOR). The after-effect of the covert orienting hypothesis (ACOH) postulates a close link between attention shifting, IOR, and oculomotor control. The fixation offset, which improves the generation of saccades, decreases IOR in detection tasks, suggesting a close link between IOR and oculomotor control. However, according to some alternative views (e.g., the input-based IOR hypothesis and the object files segregation/integration hypothesis), IOR may be related to some sensory rather than motor processes. Some studies support that view and show that IOR may occur differently in detection and discrimination tasks and that oculomotor processes do not affect IOR in tasks where manual responses are required and eye movements are suppressed. Two experiments presented in this article show that removing the fixation point decreases manual IOR in detection and discrimination tasks. The results are discussed in terms of various theoretical approaches.
  • 022 $a detection cost theory
  • 022 $a Exogenous attention
  • 022 $a Fixation offset
  • 022 $a inhibition of return (IOR)
  • 022 $a input-based IOR
  • 022 $a Premotor theory
  • 966 $a psychologia
  • 985 $a Wydział Filozoficzny
  • 985 $b Instytut Psychologii

Dublin Core