Nierówne traktowanie z powodu religii lub przekonań

Kolekcja
artykuły
Pobierz opis bibliograficzny

Opis

  • Tytuł: Nierówne traktowanie z powodu religii lub przekonań
  • Autor/Autorzy: ANDRZEJ ŚWIĄTKOWSKI (Autor)
  • Nazwa czasopisma: Studia z zakresu prawa pracy i polityki społecznej
  • Rok: 2023
  • Tom: 30
  • Numer: 1
  • ISSN: 1429-9585
  • e-ISSN: 2544-4654
  • DOI: 10.4467/25444654SPP.23.003.17605
  • Adres www:: https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/szppips/artykul/nierowne-traktowanie-z-powodu-religii-lub-przekonan
  • Strony od-do: 33-46
  • Abstrakt: The article presents the legal opinions of two Advocates General (AG) of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and two judgments of this court (CJEU) issued in cases C-157/15 and C-188/2015 in matters relating to religion. The main research method used in the article is the dogmatic method. The author analyzes the positions of two lawyers employed as AG CJEU in matters concerning the imposition of bans by entrepreneurs on persons employed, displaying religious symbols in places and time of work. The article is divided into five parts. In the first part, the author looks at legal concepts such as discrimination and religious freedom. In the second part, the reader is introduced to the essence of the dispute between entrepreneurs and employed believers of religion. The third part deals with the cases regulated by the provisions of Directive 2000/78/EC concerning lawful exceptions to the prohibition of discrimination. The fourth part is devoted to the policy of religious neutrality recognized by the European Union as a remedy between employers and employees. In the last, fifth part, the operative parts of the judgments of the Court of Justice are listed. CJEU rulings prohibit employees from wearing and displaying overly visible religious symbols. Failure to comply with this prohibition cannot be considered as direct discrimination on the basis of religion. The interest of the entrepreneur is not a sufficient justification for the parties to the re-employment relationship to reach an agreement, because the wearing of religious symbols by employees in the workplace cannot be considered as a “significant professional requirement.”
  • Słowa kluczowe:
    • dyrektywa 2000/78/WE
    • dyskryminacja
    • nierówne traktowanie
    • polityka społeczna
    • środowisko pracy
    • zakaz noszenia symboli religijnych
  • Dyscyplina: nauki o polityce i administracji

MARC

  • 002 $a Nierówne traktowanie z powodu religii lub przekonań
  • 003 $a ANDRZEJ ŚWIĄTKOWSKI (Autor)
  • 004 $a Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
  • 006 $a Studia z zakresu prawa pracy i polityki społecznej
  • 008 $a 2023
  • 009 $a 30
  • 010 $a 1
  • 011 $a 1429-9585
  • 012 $a 2544-4654
  • 013 $a 10.4467/25444654SPP.23.003.17605
  • 014 $a https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/szppips/artykul/nierowne-traktowanie-z-powodu-religii-lub-przekonan
  • 015 $a 33-46
  • 020 $a The article presents the legal opinions of two Advocates General (AG) of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and two judgments of this court (CJEU) issued in cases C-157/15 and C-188/2015 in matters relating to religion. The main research method used in the article is the dogmatic method. The author analyzes the positions of two lawyers employed as AG CJEU in matters concerning the imposition of bans by entrepreneurs on persons employed, displaying religious symbols in places and time of work. The article is divided into five parts. In the first part, the author looks at legal concepts such as discrimination and religious freedom. In the second part, the reader is introduced to the essence of the dispute between entrepreneurs and employed believers of religion. The third part deals with the cases regulated by the provisions of Directive 2000/78/EC concerning lawful exceptions to the prohibition of discrimination. The fourth part is devoted to the policy of religious neutrality recognized by the European Union as a remedy between employers and employees. In the last, fifth part, the operative parts of the judgments of the Court of Justice are listed. CJEU rulings prohibit employees from wearing and displaying overly visible religious symbols. Failure to comply with this prohibition cannot be considered as direct discrimination on the basis of religion. The interest of the entrepreneur is not a sufficient justification for the parties to the re-employment relationship to reach an agreement, because the wearing of religious symbols by employees in the workplace cannot be considered as a “significant professional requirement.”
  • 021 $a dyrektywa 2000/78/WE
  • 021 $a dyskryminacja
  • 021 $a nierówne traktowanie
  • 021 $a polityka społeczna
  • 021 $a środowisko pracy
  • 021 $a zakaz noszenia symboli religijnych
  • 022 $a directive 2000/78/EC
  • 022 $a discrimination
  • 022 $a prohibition of wearing religious symbols
  • 022 $a social policy
  • 022 $a the work environment
  • 022 $a unequal treatment
  • 966 $a nauki o polityce i administracji
  • 985 $a Wydział Pedagogiczny
  • 985 $b Instytut Nauk o Polityce i Administracji

Dublin Core

Pliki

2023_art_Świątkowski A_ Nierówne traktowanie z powodu religii lub przekonań.pdf (777 KB)

  • Licencja: CC BY 4.0
  • Wersja tekstu: Ostateczna opublikowana
  • Dostępność: Publiczny